Onscryn vs
Cameyo.
Cameyo, now part of Google, is one of the closest products to Onscryn: it brings Windows apps to the browser without a virtual desktop. If you are choosing between them, the question is less about the idea and more about ecosystem, control and what comes around the stream.
| Onscryn | Cameyo by Google | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Windows apps streamed to a browser tab, with controls and automation | A virtual app delivery service that brings client-based apps to the web |
| How users open apps | A link, or a catalog, in any modern browser | A browser, with apps as progressive web apps launched from an app shelf |
| Ecosystem | Not tied to one browser or admin console | Integrates with Chrome Enterprise, Google Workspace and ChromeOS, per Google |
| Where apps run | Windows hosts you enroll, in your network or a cloud you choose | Google's page does not list deployment models. Ask them |
| Needs a virtual desktop or VPN | No | Google states no VPN or virtual desktop is required |
| Data controls | Clipboard and file policy at the broker, watermark, recording | Google describes a zero-trust architecture. Check their documentation for specifics |
| Automation | UI-tree workflows and a Copilot (preview) built in | Check their documentation |
Choose Cameyo if
- Your people work in Chrome, Chrome Enterprise or ChromeOS, and you want apps to feel like part of that environment.
- You already buy Google Workspace and want one vendor relationship.
- You prefer a managed service with Google behind it.
Choose Onscryn if
- You want to keep apps on hosts you control, in your network or your choice of cloud.
- Your people use a mix of browsers and devices, and you do not want to depend on one ecosystem.
- You want recording, data controls and workflow automation in the same product.
- You want your own sign-in, roles and branding in front of the apps.
How they differ in practice
Google describes Cameyo as turning legacy Windows apps into progressive web apps that launch from an app shelf, with zero-trust security and no need for a VPN or a virtual desktop. Onscryn takes a similar view of the user experience, a browser tab and nothing to install, but is built around hosts you enroll and the policy, recording and automation around each session.
Which matters more depends on where you are today. If your organization is standardized on Google's admin and browser stack, that is a real advantage. If it is not, or you want the apps to stay on infrastructure you decide, the answer may differ.
Pricing and deployment
We do not quote Cameyo prices. Google's page directs people to talk to an expert, and third-party listings disagree with each other, so we cannot verify a figure. Ask both vendors for a quote against the same set of applications and users, and compare like with like.
Sources, reviewed October 2026
We make Onscryn. Vendors change products and terms, so check their documentation before you decide. Spot something out of date? Tell us at [email protected].
Questions.
They aim at the same goal, Windows apps in a browser, but differ in ecosystem, where apps run and what is built in around the stream.
More comparisons
Onscryn vs Azure Virtual Desktop
How Onscryn compares with Microsoft's Azure Virtual Desktop for publishing Windows apps: where each runs, how licensing works, what you manage, and which fits.
Onscryn vs Citrix
How Onscryn compares with Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops (Citrix DaaS) for delivering Windows apps: browser access, setup, what you manage, and when each fits.
Onscryn vs Microsoft RDS
How Onscryn compares with Windows Server Remote Desktop Services (RDS) and its web client: what you need to set up, licensing, and what you get in a browser.
Onscryn vs Amazon WorkSpaces Applications
How Onscryn compares with Amazon WorkSpaces Applications, formerly AppStream 2.0: where apps run, how they are billed, how users connect, and which fits.